The House of Mirth

Audience Reviews

View More

Robert P @Superbad 2 hrs ago The House of Mirth is a 3.5 star Movie so why are some people giving it a *5* star to .5* rating??? See more Geoffrey H @RT39525449 Nov 1, 2025 Edith Wharton may have the satirical touch of an American Austen but she has the despairing gaze of a Thomas Hardy. Terence Davies’ ably directed 2000 adaptation of Wharton’s 1905 novel, ‘The House of Mirth’, has a stately and chilling grandeur about it, reminiscent at times of Ancient Greek tragedy. Gillian Anderson as Lily Bart gives possibly her finest performance on film. Turn of the C20th New York’s high society is recreated in all its callous snobbery and hypocrisy by ‘The House of Mirth’; money is the brutal measure of an individual’s worth. With Trumpian ethics rampant across today’s USA, this re-release is timely and relevant; there are obvious parallels to be made between then and now. (Britain is currently having a rude awakening about the shocking behaviour of its own powerful and privileged class, of course, so perhaps we don’t really need to cross the Atlantic to find telling comparisons.) It is a compelling watch and good on the ear too. The dialogue seems effortlessly lifted from the original novel and is delivered by an excellent cast. The insidious social niceties and manners of the time are convincingly portrayed. As for the curious title, it comes from Ecclesiastes 7:4: ‘The heart of the wise is in the house of mourning; but the heart of fools is in the house of mirth.’ See more Patricia W @RT52876138 Jun 25, 2025 Easily one of the worst films i've ever seen.Stilted ridiculous dialogue.Hideous acting.Anderson is simply awful.Like watching paint dry. See more Alec B @Alec97 Feb 26, 2024 Its a great adaptation of the novel because it so clearly understands that the real tragedy here is that Lily is punished because she is terrible at playing the arbitrary social games of her era and she refuses to be as cruel as everyone else. See more Steve D @RT35616104 Feb 10, 2023 Bleak and melodramatic. See more isla s @RT89656869 Sep 4, 2022 This is a somewhat dull period drama film. The performances are ok and the costumes and setting are good but the story is a bit plain. I suppose it does well at painting a picture of how women were regarded at the time the film is set (the 1920s). I do like a good period drama but there isn't quite enough full blown drama in this. I thought Gillian Anderson and Dan Ackroyd gave particularly good performances and I note that Anthony LaPaglia (of Without A Trace (US crime drama show) fame) also features. These films appeal to me more in terms of enjoying the context their set in - the grand palacial homes and the social commentary side of things. Unlike other films, this one didn't really grab my attention as such - I feel it was rather long winded but its not without any merit. I wouldn't especially recommend this film as such, no. Oh and also this may be called 'House of Mirth' but I honestly can't say I found myself laughing while watching it. I suppose if it tackles any one particular subject, it'd be shame. See more Read all reviews

The House of Mirth

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING